Saw Ophthalmologist About Possible Surgery

We’ve had an eye condition (retinopathy of prematurity) that caused us to be legally blind all our life. About ten to maybe fifteen years ago, we developed a cataract on our left eye. This is a known complication. We’d been operated on a cataract on our right eye in 1993, without a lens implant cause our retina specialist did the surgery. The cataract specialist at the Rotterdam eye hospital didn’t feel it’d have any benefit so refused to operate on us. In 2004, we saw an eye doctor for an unrelated problem and our father offhandly asked whether cataract surgery would make any sense. The doctor said that we’d have to decide whether we felt it could restore any sight. He didn’t offer any prognosis or exams that could predict this. Of course, we weren’t there for the cataract, and this was not a university hospital, so I understand.

Over the years, we’ve often had thoughts of what if, but I pushed them away believing I’d upset our parents if we didn’t accept our total blindness. After all, our parents had stopped taking us to the eye doctor in 1995 because, or so I thought, they felt we were blind anyway. Now that I’ve discussed the current round of eye doc visits with them a few times, I realize they probably fared on the advice of my retina specialist and on their gut instinct, having the best of intentions in mind.

About a year ago, I started discussing the possiblity of cataract surgery with my staff. One of the nurses, the first I told, was immediately hyper, and said that it’d be great if we could get even a tiny bit of vision back. I wasn’t so sure, thinking I’d upset the littles and re-enact the trauma of our vision loss if I went through the ophthalmology department again. After discussing the issue with a few other nurses, including my named nurse, I decided in January to ask my GP to refer me to my local university hospital’s ophthalmolgoy department anyway. We went there for our initial appointment on March 8, and were taken very seriously. The optometrist measured my vison, which was no more than a tiny bit of light perception. That hurt some of us. The ophthalmologist decided to order an ultrasound of my eye and to ask for my old records from Rotterdam and the eye doc I’d seen in 2004.

The ultrasound and a huge amount of other tests were done March 26. The ultrasound showed our left retina was still attached (they scanned our right eye too, but that had a total retinal detachment) and the optic nerve was fine, but there were some problems with the sclera (that’s part of the retina if I remember correctly) and the eye was very small (microphthalmia). The doctor, same as on March 8, hadn’t yet received our records, so he’d get me a new appointment if he got them.

So that new appointment was today, this time with different doctors. First, we saw the resident, who explained the complicatedness of cataract surgery in our case. She said that normally surgery is done under local anesthesia, but if we couldn’t handle this, she could ask for general anesthesia should surgery be done. I was a bit stoic but our husband said we’d already had difficulty handling eye exams, so general anesthesia may be best. Then the doctor explained that she had gotten my records but couldn’t read them. This made it hard for her to say how much we might gain from surgeyr. “What do you think?” she asked. Argh, I have no idea.

The specialist, one of the two doctors doing cataract surgeries in this hospital, came in and apparently either could read my records or somehow otherwise figured stuff out, cause he said we might gain hand motion vision. This translates to about 1/100 to 2/100 acuity. He apparently considered this worth enough not to kick me out of his office for. The resident had asked whether I would prefer to go for surgery, and I said yes I would. The specialist did explain the risks, which included retinal detachment and bleeding, but then he left the decision pretty much with us. I decided to get us put onto the waiting list for surgery.

Then we went to a nurse to have a load of flyers given to us and to discuss the nursing issues facing us once we’re going in for surgery. I did mention we have a dissociatve disorder, because I’d heard from someone in a similar situation a few years back that anesthesia could make this worse. The nurse had obviously never heard of this, couldn’t spell it, and I was too tired and unsure of myself to mutter “multiple personality disorder” or some equivalent of it. We have an appointment with the anesthesiologist on July 1, and it may take forever before we’re called in for surgery. Oh well, after having had no vision for ten or more years, a wait of so many months doesn’t matter to me.

Katinka

The Thing with Psychological Evaluations

When the body was eleven, the school had us evaluated by their educational psychologist. He didn’t do intelligence testing, just an assessment of our emotional/behavioral functioning. He concluded we needed to go residential at the school for the blind we were at back then, and according to my parents denied our intellligence. My parents obviously didn’t agree, as they wanted us to stay home and go to regular education. Of course, I sometimes wonder which would’ve been better, but I at the time didn’t want to be institutionalized at all, so was thankful that my parents fought the psychologist. They took us for a second opinion with an educational psychologist at another school for the blind. This psychologist had evaluted us several times before. She did intelligience testing as well as an assessment of emotional/behavioral functioning, observed us and talked to us. She concluded we were highly intelligent, but did have emotional and behavioral problems, difficulty coping with our blindness, and some other things. She advised us to stay in special ed, but there wasn’t any talk of going residential. We knew by the time of this second opinion that we had to put up an image of ourselves. Fortunately (I say now) this psychologist caught us lying.

So far so good. Even though it was stressful being evaluated, I understood my parents’ reasoning. However, instead of taking the advice for what it was, my parents waited just a year and had us re-evaluated. For a reason I consider suspicious, they chose an ed psych who had never seen a blind child before. I lied even more on this third evaluation, and this psychologist didn’t find out. He did intelligence testing again and some emotional evaluation too, but obviously nothign specific to blind children. I lied on the very pointed questions about emotional wellbeing. Therefore, there are things I know to be blatantly false in the report. For example, the psychologist reported we had no issues with low self-worth, while at the time I can honestly say we were seriously depressed – possibly the closest to major depression we’ve ever been.

This psychologist recommended we try out the remainder of the school year (the eval took place in January) at a regular school. The special school I was attending at the time (a different school for the blid again) wanted us to go to a school in that town, but our parents had set their and my eyes on what would become our secondary school. They pushed our admission to the school and, instead of using the remainder of the school year as a test period, they had us sit in with a seventh grade class for a few days once we had already been accepted. We couldn’t be fully honest by that time, and have kept a lot to ourselves throughout secondary school.

In a way, I understand our parents’ actions. They badly wanted us to get the best education. This makes it even harder for me to cope with. I am not sure whether this keeping up appearances happened more often, but I suspect it did. This affects some of us very negatively. Jane is a master at keeping up a shiny image. Of course not always, as her idetifying herself was one of the first signs that we are DID for our therapist. In general, however, and especially when doing structured evaluations, she’s a good liar. It’s not necessarily about keeping up appearances of great emotional health. I’ve suspected for a while now that it is more a general adherence to whatever the person most in authority at the moment wants us to be like.

Clarissa

Restarting Our Blog

Hi, this is Katinka. We’ve had a number of blogs for ourselves on a number of sites over the years, and after a while we’re returning to WordPress. I really hope this blog will stay active, as I do know a lot of mental health loggers here. I need to say a little about the fact that it’s me posting: a few months ago, we noticed that it wasn’t helping to push Astrid in front at all times. Astrid doens’t have a clue who she is or if she’s even real at all. Mostly it was Clarissa taking over anyway, or it was me but I had to pretend to be Astrid. We decided to make Clarissa, Kirsten and myself responsible for daily life. Astrid does occasionally come out, but she has no identity of her own, which is hard if you want to function in daily life as an adult.

In case we get readers who do not know us, I’ll say a little about our situation. At the moment, we reside in a mental institution. We have a wonderful husband of 1 1/2 years who visits us a few times a week and whom we spend (part of) the week-ends with. Besides our trauma-based conditions, we are autistic and blind. The parts vary in their degree of autism and some don’t acknowledge our blindness. We have been lookign for a qualified therapit for a while, because our regular therapist doesn’t have experience with DID. Earlier this year, we thought we’d foudn someone, but she ended up being unable to take on new clients. We’re now on someone else’s waiting list.

Katinka